Реферат
Objectives: Opioids play a significant role in the effective management of cancer-related pain. The COVID-19 lock down may have reduced access to opioids and caused a decline in the use of prescription of opioids among cancer survivors. This study compared opioid prescription rates among cancer survivors before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic using real-world electronic health records (EHR). Method(s): Cohort analyses of cancer patients using data from EHR database from the TriNetX, a global federated health research network across 76 healthcare organizations. We analyzed changes in prescription opioid use before (March 1, 2018, through March 1, 2019) and after onset of COVID-19 (April 01, 2020, through March 2021) among cancer survivors. The key outcome variable was any opioid prescription within 1 year of cancer diagnosis. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance the characteristics (age, sex, race, diagnoses including diabetes, hypertensive diseases, overweight, mood disorders, and visual disturbances) of the two cohorts. Data were analyzed using the TriNetX platform. Result(s): There were 1,502,143 cancer survivors before COVID-19 and 1,412,599 cancer survivors after the onset of COVID-19. The one-to-one propensity-score match yielded 1,382,561 cancer patients, mean age 64 at cancer diagnosis, and 73% were white. Percentage of opioid use among cancer patients declined from 35.6% before the COVID-19 to 35.1% after the onset of the pandemic (OR=0.976, 95% CI 0.971-0.981). Average number of opioid prescriptions within 1 year of cancer diagnosis declined from 5.7 before to 5.3 after the COVID-19 onset (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): Among cancer survivors, a small decline in prescription opioid use was observed after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to distinguish the impact of revised guidelines, opioid prescription policy changes, and COVID-19 lock down on lower rates of prescription opioid use among cancer survivors.Copyright © 2023
Реферат
Aims: Globally, mental illness and substance use disorders are the leading cause of disability and disease burden for young people. Orygen is an Australian youth mental health organization with a mission to reduce the impact of mental ill-health on young people, families and society, and one of only a few known research and clinical centres with a dedicated Knowledge Translation division. This paper provides a case study of the workforce development team within Orygen Knowledge Translation, outlining how implementation science informs their work and how the division has adapted its model of service support in the face of COVID-19. Method(s): Process data on training and resources developed and delivered by the workforce development team at Orygen over the period 2017-2021 was collated and synthesized with team reflections about the adaptations made by team in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results and Conclusion(s): Since 2017, the team has delivered training to more than 4000 youth mental health workers across Australia, on the topics of trauma, psychosis, mood and anxiety disorders, brief interventions, cognition and other areas of youth mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic generated abrupt and dramatic changes to the delivery of workforce and service development initiatives in Australia due to significant restrictions to travel and in-person events. It also placed major delivery demands on youth mental health services. The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated profound and rapid changes to service delivery and development in Australian youth mental health. Implementation science offers flexible models to support a changing system.
Реферат
Objectives: Long-COVID, the persistence of various symptoms after COVID-19 infection, is still not fully understood. This study evaluated the incidence and chronicity of post-COVID-19 conditions using administrative claims, which provide a large, generalizable sample, to provide insight into the scope of long-COVID in the United States. Method(s): Patients newly diagnosed with COVID-19 from 4/1/2020-3/31/2021 were identified in the MerativeTM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. The first COVID-19 diagnosis served as the index date and patients were continuously eligible for 12-months pre- and post-index. Incident conditions were defined as a new diagnosis (no pre-period diagnoses) for one of 17 conditions of interest in the first 60-days of the post-period. Among patients with an incident condition, chronicity of the condition was assessed over the remaining post-period (long-term conditions). Result(s): The sample included 503,742 patients;mean+/-SD age was 39.5+/-16.5 and 46% were male. The most common incident conditions were respiratory symptoms (24.1%), fatigue (7.3%), muscle pain (6.0%), and headache (5.9%). Among patients with each of these conditions, long-term persistence was observed in 21.9% for respiratory symptoms, 36.8% for muscle pain, 18.3% for fatigue, and 16.0% for headache. Fewer than 5% patients evidenced incident anxiety, mood disorders, myocarditis, sleep disorders, or pulmonary embolism;however, among these patients, over 40% had long-term persistence of the condition. Among patients with long-term conditions, sleep disorders (248+/-98 days), mood disorders (239+/-96 days), anxiety (236+/-95 days), respiratory symptoms (233+/-92 days), and asthma (230+/-93 days) had the longest average durations of persistence, evidenced by continued claims over the post-period. Conclusion(s): With the continued presence of COVID-19 an understanding of the risk of long-term symptoms is needed to help manage patients both during and following infection. These findings provide some initial insight into the incidence and tenure of various conditions that are affecting patients diagnosed with COVID-19.Copyright © 2023
Реферат
Background. Postpartum mothers' mental health has a significant role in mothers' well-being and child's growth and develop-ment. This issue is worsened during a pandemic when social restrictions are regulated, resulting in perceived stress, baby blues, postpartum depression, and other mental health issues. Objective. This study intends to investigate postpartum moth-ers' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This study's methodology is a scoping review using the prism-ScR checklist, the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool, and a population, exposure, outcome framework. It uses 4 databases: Pubmed, Willey, Proquest, and ScienceDirect;its inclusion criteria is original English articles that can be accessed in full text between 2020 and 2022. Results. Out of 190 publications, we found 7 that are pertinent to the research goals. Qualitative research, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies make up the research. The mapping result includes 4 themes: the types of mental health problems experi-enced by postpartum moms during the Pandemic, risk and predic-tive factors, postpartum mothers' experiences, and the effects of mothers' mental health problems. Conclusion. After giving birth, most mothers experience stress, anxiety, and depression. Postpartum mental health concerns are influenced by isolation, social exclusion, and crises. The cre-ation of a customized plan for early assistance for a woman's mental health requirements, as well as the establishment of an accessi-ble mental health provider, including medical personnel and medical facilities, is advised for pregnant and postpartum women. only.Copyright © the Author(s), 2023.
Реферат
Objectives: COVID-19-related stressors - including social distancing, material hardship, increased intimate partner violence, and loss of childcare, among others - may result in a higher prevalence of depression among postpartum individuals. This study examines trends in postpartum depression in the US from 2018 to 2022, as well as correlates of treatment choices among women with postpartum depression. Method(s): 1,108,874 women aged 14-64 in the Komodo Healthcare Map with 1+ live birth between April 2018 and December 2021 and had continuous enrollment 2+ years before and 4+ months after the delivery date were included. Prevalence of depression during postpartum (within 3 months after delivery) was calculated before (April 2018-March 2020) and during (April 2020-March 2022) COVID-19. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate correlates of treatment choices (no treatment, medication-only, psychotherapy-only, or both). Result(s): The prevalence of postpartum depression increased from 9.7% pre-pandemic to 12.0% during the pandemic (p < 0.001). Among 119,788 women with postpartum depression in 2018-2022, 47.0% received no treatment, 35.0% received medication-only, 10.0% received psychotherapy-only, and 7.4% received both within one month following their first depression diagnosis. Factors associated with an increase in the odds of receiving medication-psychotherapy treatment (vs. no treatment) included older ages;commercial insurance coverage;lower social vulnerability index;history of anxiety or mood disorder during and before pregnancy;and being diagnosed by a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or behavioral care practitioner (vs. physician). Similar patterns were observed for medication-only and psychotherapy-only treatments. Conclusion(s): In this large, nationally representative sample of US insured population, the prevalence of postpartum depression increased significantly by 2.3 percentage-points during the pandemic (or a relative increase of 23.7%). Nonetheless, almost half of women with postpartum depression received no treatment, and only 7.5% received both medication and psychotherapy. The study highlighted potential socioeconomic and provider variation in postpartum depression treatment.Copyright © 2023
Реферат
Cerebral microangiopathy (CMA) is one of the significant causes of depression in the elderly. Close associations of the risk of developing depression with white matter hyperintensity, the presence of lacunar infarcts, and other markers of vascular disease are shown. The available data suggest that various vascular mechanisms, in particular, involvement of small vessels of the brain, generalized microvascular and endothelial dysfunction, metabolic risk factors, - are risk factors for the development of depression. Pathogenetic mechanisms include cerebral hypoperfusion and immune dysregulation. Depression is also a common complication of coronavirus infection, occurring both in the acute and post-COVID periods. The same mechanisms as in vascular depression are involved in the pathogenesis of the development of post-COVID depressive disorders. Given the complexity of the mechanisms of development of depressive disorders in patients with CMA, the presence of severe comorbid vascular pathology, antidepressants with an optimal ratio of efficacy and safety should be preferred. Agomelatine (Valdoxan) is one of such drugs.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
Реферат
Purpose: This study's purpose was to evaluate trends in mood disorders in incoming collegiate cross-country and track and field athletes to appropriately allocate resources. The prevalence of mood disorders surrounding the COVID- 19 pandemic was of interest. Method(s): Preparticipation questionnaires of incoming firstyear cross country and track and field athletes at The Ohio State University were reviewed between the years 2018-2022 (n = 138). Data regarding psychiatric history were collected and evaluated for trends based on year of matriculation, reported gender, family history of mood disorders, and specific sporting event. Result(s): The prevalence of history of mood disorder or counseling in incoming first-year cross country and track and field athletes was not statistically different across the five years from 2018 to 2022. Female athletes were 2.6 times more likely to report a history of mood disorder or counseling compared with male athletes (P = 0.02, CI 1.17-5.96). Prevalence of history of mood disorder or counseling was highest in distance runners, lower in field athletes, and least in sprinters, but this difference was not significant (P = 0.322). Athletes who reported a personal history of mood disorder or counseling were 42.9 times more likely to also report family history of a mood disorder (P < 0.001, CI 5.2-351.5). Conclusion(s): The prevalence of mood disorders in first-year cross country and track and field athletes have remained stable over the past five years despite the COVID-19 pandemic and increased normalization of mental health problems. Female cross country and track and field athletes are more than twice as likely as males to start college with a history of a mood problem. There is a strong association between personal and family history of mood disorders. Significance: More psychological resources may need to be allotted to female cross country and track and field athletes compared with males. It may not be necessary to increase mood resources overall, because prevalence remains stable over the years.
Реферат
Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is increasingly provided by health care teams through telehealth or hybrid modalities. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess the published literature and examine the economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes of CMM services provided by pharmacists via telehealth or hybrid modalities. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included if they: reported on economic, clinical, or humanistic outcomes;were conducted via telehealth or hybrid modalities;included a pharmacist on their interprofessional team;and evaluated CMM services. The search was conducted between January 1, 2000, and September 28, 2021. The search strategy was adapted for use in Medline (PubMed);Embase;Cochrane;Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature;PsychINFO;International Pharmaceutical s;Scopus;and grey literature. Four reviewers extracted data using a screening tool developed for this study and reviewed for risk of bias. Authors screened 3500 articles, from which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 observational studies, 2 RCTs). In seven studies, clinical outcomes improved with telehealth CMM interventions compared to either usual care, face-to-face CMM, or educational controls, as shown by the statistically significant changes in chronic disease clinical outcomes. Two studies evaluated and found increased patient and provider satisfaction. One study described a source of revenue for a telehealth CMM service. Overall, study results indicate that telehealth CMM services, in select cases, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, but the methods of the included studies were not homogenous enough to conclude that telehealth or hybrid modalities were superior to in-person CMM. To understand the full impact on the Quadruple Aim, additional research is needed to investigate the financial outcomes of CMM conducted using telehealth or hybrid technologies.Copyright © 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
Реферат
Objective: to study the causes and predictors of mental disorders during the COVID-19 epidemic in those who turned to psychiatrist for the first time, as well as in patients with already diagnosed mental illness. Patients and methods. We examined 100 patients who turned to a psychiatrist due to a deterioration in their mental state during the pandemic, 50 patients were newly diagnosed (Group 1) and 50 with previously diagnosed mental disorders (Group 2). The study was carried out by a clinical method using a specially designed map, followed by statistical processing of the obtained data. Results and discussion. Mental disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic more often occurred at a young age, in patients with higher and secondary specialized education, and in single patients. In the 1st group, as a result of exposure to psychogenic factors (the influence of the media, quarantine, economic changes), anxiety (36.8%) and depressive (21.1%) disorders occurred more often, and after the coronavirus infection, depressive disorders were in the first place (54.2%). The 2nd group mostly included patients with endogenous disorders (bipolar affective disorder - 24%, recurrent depressive disorder - 20%, schizophrenia - 20%), which were exacerbated more often as a result of COVID-19, to a lesser extent - psychogenic (experiences associated with a change in material status and illness of relatives). Obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders have been associated with epidemic factors. Conclusion. The results obtained indicate that there are differences between the mental disorders that first appeared during the pandemic and the exacerbations of the condition in mentally ill patients, which relate to the predictors, causes and clinical manifestations of these disorders.Copyright © 2022 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
Реферат
Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between depression, anxiety, and stress levels, headaches, and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in healthcare professionals in a post-pandemic setting. Method(s): A cross-sectional study conducted through an online questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals in Mainland Portugal. The sample's characterization was undertaken according to sociodemographic parameters. The following assessment instruments were used: 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) for emotional parameters, namely depression, anxiety, and stress;International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) for headache disorders;Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for temporomandibular joint dysfunction symptoms. Inferential analysis was performed using phi, Cramer's V, and gamma tests. Result(s): The sample comprised 118 individuals (93.2% female, 6.8% male). Results showed a prevalence of 38.1% for depression, 51.7% for anxiety, and 39.8% for stress. Regarding headaches, a prevalence of 62.7% was reported. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders had a prevalence of 50%. Significant differences were found between headache and stress (p=0.034), headache and temporomandibular joint disorders symptoms (p=0.002), and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and depression (p=0.009), anxiety (p=0.003), and stress levels (p=0.014). Conclusion(s): There seems to be a positive correlation between headaches and stress levels, between temporomandibular disorders symptoms and all psychosocial parameters, and between temporomandibular disorder symptoms and headaches. Data suggests that these symptoms worsened after the pandemic.Copyright © 2023 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentaria. Published by SPEMD.
Реферат
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated infodemic increased depression and anxiety. Proper information can help combat the infodemic and promotes mental health; however, rural residents have more difficulties in getting correct information than urban residents. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the information on COVID-19 provided by the local government maintained the mental health of rural residents in Japan. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire survey of Okura Village (northern district of Japan) residents aged ≥16 years was conducted in October 2021. The main outcomes, depressive symptoms, psychological distress, and anxiety were measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale 7-item. Exposure was defined as whether the resident read the leaflet on COVID-19 distributed by the local government. The targeted maximum likelihood estimation was used to analyse the effect of leaflet reading on the main outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 974 respondents were analysed. Reading the leaflet was significantly lower risk for depressive symptoms relative risk (95% confidence interval): 0.64 (0.43-0.95). Meanwhile, no clear effects of leaflet reading were observed on mental distress and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: In rural areas with local governments, analogue information may be effective to prevent depression.
Реферат
Objective: to study the causes and predictors of mental disorders during the COVID-19 epidemic in those who turned to psychiatrist for the first time, as well as in patients with already diagnosed mental illness. Patients and methods. We examined 100 patients who turned to a psychiatrist due to a deterioration in their mental state during the pandemic, 50 patients were newly diagnosed (Group 1) and 50 with previously diagnosed mental disorders (Group 2). The study was carried out by a clinical method using a specially designed map, followed by statistical processing of the obtained data. Results and discussion. Mental disorders caused by the COVID-19 pandemic more often occurred at a young age, in patients with higher and secondary specialized education, and in single patients. In the 1st group, as a result of exposure to psychogenic factors (the influence of the media, quarantine, economic changes), anxiety (36.8%) and depressive (21.1%) disorders occurred more often, and after the coronavirus infection, depressive disorders were in the first place (54.2%). The 2nd group mostly included patients with endogenous disorders (bipolar affective disorder - 24%, recurrent depressive disorder - 20%, schizophrenia - 20%), which were exacerbated more often as a result of COVID-19, to a lesser extent - psychogenic (experiences associated with a change in material status and illness of relatives). Obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders have been associated with epidemic factors. Conclusion. The results obtained indicate that there are differences between the mental disorders that first appeared during the pandemic and the exacerbations of the condition in mentally ill patients, which relate to the predictors, causes and clinical manifestations of these disorders.Copyright © 2022 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
Реферат
Purpose of Study: Affective symptoms, such as depression, nervousness, anxiety, and irritability, are common yet complicating aspects for concussion patients, therefore addressing exasperations of these symptoms is essential for injury management. This is an especially important consideration for patient populations increasingly susceptible to affective disorders, such as those in rural regions and adolescents. Increases in adolescent mental health problems during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic pose an additional challenge for clinicians managing affective concussion symptoms in rural adolescents. The aim of this study is to quantify the mental health effects of the pandemic by comparing affective concussion symptoms in groups of adolescents with concussion and without concussion in the Central Oregon region. Methods Used: The study is a secondary data analysis of ImPACT Concussion Test symptom scores from a cohort of non-concussed (Baseline) and concussed (Post-Injury) adolescents between the ages of 12-18, pre-pandemic (January 1, 2015 - March 20, 2020) and pandemic (March 21, 2020 - April 1, 2022). Subjects were excluded from the study if they received special education, had a diagnosis of learning disabilities, ADD, dyslexia, autism, or received treatment for headaches, migraines, epilepsy, brain surgery, meningitis, substance use or psychiatric conditions. Prevalence of symptoms of 'headache', 'trouble falling asleep', 'irritability', 'nervousness', 'sadness', and 'feeling more emotional' were noted for each group during each time period. Summary of Results: A total of pre-pandemic non-concussed (n =2667), pre-pandemic concussed (n=643), pandemic non-concussed (n = 593) and pandemic concussed (n=87) were included in the final analysis. There was a statistically significant increase in the proportions of 'nervousness' (p=0.0209) and 'sadness' (p=0.0117) in pre-pandemic and pandemic non-concussed groups. Furthermore, there were statistically significant increases in the proportions of 'headache' (p=0.0331), 'irritability' (p=0.0006), 'nervousness' (p=0.0135), 'sadness' (p=0.0357) and 'feeling more emotional' (p=0.0039) between pre-pandemic and pandemic concussed adolescents. Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates a significant increase in affective symptoms in both concussed and non-concussed groups during the COVID-19 pandemic consistent with other studies. However, those with concussion during the COVID-19 pandemic showed greater number of affective symptoms as well as somatic symptoms (headache) compared to concussed pre-pandemic adolescents. The results of this study support the broader body of research examining the mental health burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescents, and further encourages a biopsychosocial approach to injury management, in which social and emotional components of a patient's life are considered.
Реферат
The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented global public health crisis with respect to its effects on economic, physical and mental health. While early lockdown guidelines may have been effective for reducing viral transmission, prolonged quarantine and physical distancing measures may have augmented the disparities underlying the determinants of health. The aggregate effects of rapid and significant economic downturn, as well as physical and mental morbidity and mortality, are reported to increase the risk of suicide. Furthermore, students, females and individuals with pre-existing mental health illness(es) are at an increased risk for poor mental health outcomes as a result of decreased social support and gaps in healthcare access. Individuals with a mood disorder are at a greater risk for COVID-19 hospitalisation. Additionally, international collaboration addressing underlying social and economic inequities across high-, middle-and low-income countries is critical for managing infection rates. Taken together, public health policies should target upstream factors that affect the determinants of ill health.Copyright © ERS 2021.
Реферат
This case study draws attention on mental health sequelae that emerged in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak after recovery from hospitalization, even in subjects without personal psychiatric history. The case involves a 65-year-old male shift nurse who took SARS-COV-2 infection through a co-worker and that had been hospitalized for interstitial pneumonia from April 6 to April 17. After recovery, he developed psychiatric symptoms overlapping between different dimensions of psychiatric disorders and started to be followed by the Occupational Health Department of a Major University Hospital in central Italy. He reported a score of 28 at the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory and of 39 at the Self-Rating Anxiety State. He was treated with a combination therapy of SSRI and NaSSA antidepressants with clinical remission. In this case study, authors discuss the possible overlapping role of post-traumatic stress and anxiety symptoms in patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization that may deserve appropriate classification, treatment and follow up with the future goal to refine clinical management of post and long COVID syndromes of subjects who present low abnormalities in other specialty investigations.Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.
Реферат
Background: Oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir), intravenous short treatment of remdesivir and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used for early COVID-19 treatments in high risk of disease progression patients. Little is known about the impact of therapies on post-acute COVID-19 (PACS). We aimed to compare the efficacy of these therapies in terms of death, hospitalization rate and PACS at 3 months. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective observational study including all eligible outpatients aged >=18 evaluated from April 2021 to March 2022 at our COVID-19 Clinic. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: mAbs, antivirals (oral and short-course remdesivir) and controls (eligible patients who refused treatment). Persistence of symptoms (fever, dysgeusia/anosmia, cough, pharyngodynia, dyspnea, chills, nasal congestion, myalgia, headache, gastrointestinal disease, and neuro-behavioural symptoms, such as asthenia, anxiety/mood disorder, memory and concentration deficit) were evaluated after 3 months. We estimated the associations between each considered outcome and treatment through univariate and multivariable logistic models adjusted by sex, age, vaccination, early COVID treatment, treatment group and number of comorbidities (when appropriate). Result(s): We included 649 patients (51.6% males, median age 67 years, 14% unvaccinated): 242 patients were treated with mAbs, 197 with antivirals and 210 received no treatment. Overall, 36.7% of subjects had cerebro-cardiovascular disease, 22% were obese and 50% had more than one comorbidity. Overall, 29 patients (4.5%) died or were hospitalized. Death or hospitalization was positively associated only with older ages with a significant linear trend (p for trend: 0.033). Data on PACS at 3 months were available for 323 (49.8%) patients. Females showed a positive association with long COVID, with an OR of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.30-3.53) as compared to men. Patients treated with antiviral drugs showed an inverse association with long COVID (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.87 as compared to not treated patients). Patients who were treated with monoclonal antibodies showed an OR of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25-0.92) as compared to those in the control group (Table 1). Conclusion(s): The impact of early COVID-19 therapies on PACS is unknown. Our results showed that these treatments, in particular mAbs, can reduce persistence of neuro-behavioural symptoms at 3 months. (Table Presented).
Реферат
The article discusses the issues of terminology, epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of post-covid syndrome (PCS). It has been shown that the incidence of PCS in people who had COVID-19 is 10-35%;there are no generally accepted approaches to defining the term PCS. Clinical manifestations of PCS include more than 50 symptoms that occur in both children and adults, regardless of their place of residence. The damage caused by metabolites of the systemic inflammatory response of the central nervous system with the formation of a syndrome of autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, and affective disorders is of critical importance in the genesis of PCS. Antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepine drugs are used in the correction of PCS. However, they have limitations, in particular - when used in children with comorbid disorders. The use of aminoacetic acid (glycine), which has a wide range of safety, anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, and nootropic effects in the correction of PCS, can become an effective therapeutic strategy.Copyright © Team of Authors, 2022.
Реферат
Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated mitigation procedures have significantly altered daily life in ways that may disproportionately affect patients with CNS tumors. This study aimed to explore differences in symptom burden and interference, mood disturbance, and health-related quality of life in the CNS tumor patient population during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to a normative sample of pre-pandemic data. Method(s): Data from the Neuro-Oncology Branch (NOB) Natural History Study, including demographic and clinical data, as well as PROs including PROMIS Anxiety and Depression Short-Forms, EQ- 5D-3L, MDASI-Brain Tumor/Spine Tumor, and NeuroQOL-Cognition Function, were collected and compared across groups ('NOB normative sample' and 'COVID year' patients) using one-sample proportion tests. Result(s): 178 COVID year CNS tumor patients (55% male, 82% Caucasian, median age 45 years) were compared with 678 NOB normative sample patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Symptom burden remained comparably high during the COVID year compared to the NOB normative sample with the most common moderate-severe symptoms being fatigue (31% vs. 35%), difficulty remembering (28% vs. 24%), drowsiness (22% vs. 25%), disturbed sleep (20% vs. 22%), and distress (20% for both). However, a significantly greater proportion of COVID year assessments endorsed moderate-severe depression on the PROMIS compared to the NOB normative sample (17% vs. 12%, p = 0.023, Cohen's h = 0.22) and moderate-severe depression/anxiety on the EQ-5D-3L was also more prevalent (53% vs. 43%, p = 0.009, Cohen's h = 0.28). There were no other significant differences in PROs between groups. Conclusions and Implications: These findings demonstrated that while objective symptom burden for CNS tumor patients was unchanged, there was an increase in depression reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future work should investigate potential pandemic-era interventions for screening, targeting, and improving both mood disturbance and other disease-specific symptoms to improve symptom burden and quality of life.